Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 32% better in Lost Ark than Acer Predator Triton 500 - 188 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $1399.0 vs $1799.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Lost Ark than Acer Predator Triton 500 - $7.44 vs $12.67 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
142
75.53191489361703%
Value, $/FPS
$12.67/FPS
58.72138910812944%
Price, $
$1799
77%
Buy for $1,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31450 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
88.32 GPixel/s
97.35449735449735%
Texel Fillrate
220.8 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
82.15579710144927%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i7-10750H
null-core
Single-Core
1446
58.54251012145749%
Multi-Core
5396
46.413211766729745%
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 500 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
300 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
