Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 300 SE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE - 87 vs 80 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE - $949.0 vs $1079.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Acer Predator Triton 300 SE - $10.91 vs $13.5 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
FPS
80
91.95402298850574%
Value, $/FPS
$13.5/FPS
80.81481481481482%
Price, $
$1079.99
87%
Buy for $1,079.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31003 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
87
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30995 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
3rd Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700
null-core
Single-Core
2293
100%
Multi-Core
10780
100%
CPU Winner
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
85.65198430004361%
Multi-Core
9281
86.09461966604823%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
14" | Screen Size | 16" |