Key Differences
In short — ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED outperforms the cheaper acer Predator Triton 300 SE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Predator Triton 300 SE is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE Gaming Laptop
- Up to 11% cheaper than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - $1409.0 vs $1588.34
- Up to 9% better value when playing God of War than ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED - $18.06 vs $19.85 per FPS
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in God of War than acer Predator Triton 300 SE - 80 vs 78 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
78
97%
Value, $/FPS
$18.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1409
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17545 minutes ago
May 3rd, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.85/FPS
90%
Price, $
$1588.34
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,588.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
May 3rd, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 3rd, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
67%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
69%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
84%
Multi-Core
10780
65%
May 3rd, 2023
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton 300 SE Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X OLED Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | May 3rd, 2023 |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |