Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - 114 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - $989.0 vs $1149.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing No Man's Sky than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - $8.68 vs $10.74 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
107
93.85964912280701%
Value, $/FPS
$10.74/FPS
80.8193668528864%
Price, $
$1149
86%
Buy for $1,149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49695 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
114
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$989
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
85.65198430004361%
Multi-Core
9281
86.09461966604823%
acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
