Key Differences
In short — Alienware m16 R2 outperforms the cheaper acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Up to 45% cheaper than Alienware m16 R2 - $1149.00 vs $2099.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Alienware m16 R2 - $3.92 vs $6.18 per FPS
Advantages of Alienware m16 R2 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz - 340 vs 293 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
293
86%
Value, $/FPS
$3.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1149
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Buy for $2,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
70%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14"" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Alienware m16 R2 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
