Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14" WUXGA 165Hz outperforms the cheaper NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 144% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - 66 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 46% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS - $15.89 vs $29.63 per FPS
Advantages of NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14" WUXGA 165Hz - $799.99 vs $1049.00
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1049
76%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
97%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon 680M
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
62%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14" WUXGA 165Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | NIMO 17.3 FHD IPS Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon 680M |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
