Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-7691 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-7691 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 23% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS Q540VJ - 112 vs 91 FPS
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 31% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-7691 - $1099.0 vs $1599.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-7691 - $12.08 vs $14.28 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
112
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.28/FPS
84%
Price, $
$1599
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for $1,099 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
124.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
249.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
33%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
27%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Triton 300 PT315-53-7691 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
