Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop
- Performs up to 82% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 71 vs 39 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $1339.0 vs $1398.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $18.86 vs $35.85 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
FPS
39
54%
Value, $/FPS
$35.85/FPS
52%
Price, $
$1398
95%
Buy for $1,398 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
FPS
71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
83%
Texel Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
94%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 1st, 2020 • 9th Variation
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
54%
Multi-Core
5396
36%
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
