Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD outperforms the more expensive Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop
- Performs up to 59% better in Alan Wake 2 than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 54 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $1339.0 vs $1489.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $24.8 vs $43.79 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
6th Variation
FPS
34
62%
Value, $/FPS
$43.79/FPS
56%
Price, $
$1489
89%
Buy for $1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
FPS
54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$24.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
72%
Multi-Core
7887
53%
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Vivobook 16X FHD Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 24 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 120 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
