Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the cheaper Acer Predator Triton 300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 4% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $1489.0 vs $1549.0
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 30% better in No Man's Sky than Acer Predator Triton 300 - 126 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 20% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $12.29 vs $15.35 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
FPS
97
76.98412698412699%
Value, $/FPS
$15.35/FPS
80.06514657980456%
Price, $
$1489
100%
Buy for $1,489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52439 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
6th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75.3968253968254%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94.26681367144431%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i7-11800H
null-core
Single-Core
1900
76.92307692307693%
Multi-Core
7887
67.8393256494065%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 24 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
