Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 300 outperforms the cheaper MALLRACE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MALLRACE is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 23 than MALLRACE - 81 vs 71 FPS
Advantages of MALLRACE Gaming Laptop
- Up to 54% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $1699.99 vs $3699.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 23 than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $23.94 vs $45.67 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
3rd Variation
FPS
81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$45.67/FPS
52.41953142106416%
Price, $
$3699
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1868 minutes ago
FPS
71
87.65432098765432%
Value, $/FPS
$23.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1699.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
92.16 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
207.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.36111111111111%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
30.858244937319192%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-10750H
null-core
Single-Core
1446
87.42442563482467%
Multi-Core
5396
86.9621273166801%
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | MALLRACE Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 7 5825U |
| GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
