Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Acer Predator Triton 300 outperforms the cheaper MSI GF65 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 267% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI GF65 - 11 vs 3 FPS
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than MSI GF65 - $123.55 vs $321.34 per FPS
Advantages of MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 29% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $964.01 vs $1359.0
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
15th Variation
FPS
11
100%
Value, $/FPS
$123.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1359
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2363 minutes ago
Buy for $964.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2377 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
15th Variation
Jan 26th, 2021
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
Jan 26th, 2021
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
100%
Multi-Core
7887
100%
CPU Winner
Jan 26th, 2021
Core i7-10750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1446
76%
Multi-Core
5396
68%
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | MSI GF65 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2021 |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core i7-10750H |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
