Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton 300 outperforms the cheaper ASUS Q540VJ on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS Q540VJ is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 24% better in Monster Hunter: World than ASUS Q540VJ - 97 vs 78 FPS
Advantages of ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop
- Up to 24% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $1199.99 vs $1585.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Acer Predator Triton 300 - $15.38 vs $16.34 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Oct 26th, 2022 • 11th Variation
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.34/FPS
94%
Price, $
$1585
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5034 minutes ago
Buy for $1,199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Oct 26th, 2022 • 11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Oct 26th, 2022 • 11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
39%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Oct 26th, 2022 • 11th Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
84%
Multi-Core
10780
65%
Acer Predator Triton 300 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS Q540VJ Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2022 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
