Key Differences
In short — Alienware X16 R2 outperforms the cheaper acer Predator Triton 300 - on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing acer Predator Triton 300 - is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 - Laptop
- Up to 46% cheaper than Alienware X16 R2 - $1689.00 vs $3099.99
- Up to 7% better value when playing Death Stranding than Alienware X16 R2 - $16.72 vs $17.92 per FPS
Advantages of Alienware X16 R2 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 71% better in Death Stranding than acer Predator Triton 300 - - 173 vs 101 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $1,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Jan 31st, 2024
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$17.92/FPS
93%
Price, $
$3099.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for $3,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
44%
Jan 31st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 31st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton 300 - Laptop | vs | Alienware X16 R2 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Jan 31st, 2024 |
Core i7-11800H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |