Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16-71 16” outperforms the cheaper acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16-71 16” Laptop
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield V than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 - 161 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 18% better value when playing Battlefield V than acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 - $6.52 vs $7.95 per FPS
Advantages of acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 0% cheaper than acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16-71 16” - $1049.0 vs $1050.0
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1050
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,050 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
3rd Variation
FPS
132
81%
Value, $/FPS
$7.95/FPS
82%
Price, $
$1049
100%
Buy for $1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
68.4 GPixel/s
75%
Texel Fillrate
171 GTexel/s
94%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
87%
Multi-Core
10780
73%
acer Predator Helios Neo PHN16-71 16” Laptop | vs | acer Predator Triton 300 SE 14 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i7-12700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 14" |
