Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Helios Neo 16 outperforms the cheaper HP Victus 16.1 Ryzen 7 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing HP Victus 16.1 Ryzen 7 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than HP Victus 16.1 Ryzen 7 - 81 vs 79 FPS
Advantages of HP Victus 16.1 Ryzen 7 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 8% cheaper than acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $1169.00 vs $1268.11
- Up to 5% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $14.80 vs $15.66 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
18th Variation
FPS
81
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.66/FPS
95%
Price, $
$1268.11
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,268.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 400 minutes ago
Buy for $1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 399 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
18th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
18th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Victus 16.1 Ryzen 7 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
