Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Helios Neo 16 outperforms the cheaper ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ASUS TUF A16 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than ASUS TUF A16 - 75 vs 71 FPS
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Up to 6% cheaper than acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $1399.0 vs $1488.99
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dead Space than acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $19.7 vs $19.85 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
FPS
75
100%
Value, $/FPS
$19.85/FPS
99.24433249370276%
Price, $
$1488.99
93%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,488.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5186 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
71
94.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$19.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1399
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
88.15132048536759%
Multi-Core
11626
70.39234681520949%
acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
