Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Predator Helios Neo 16 outperforms the cheaper Acer Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 124% better in Deathloop than Acer Nitro 5 - 94 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 23% better value when playing Deathloop than Acer Nitro 5 - $15.84 vs $20.45 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 42% cheaper than acer Predator Helios Neo 16 - $859.0 vs $1488.99
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
FPS
94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$15.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1488.99
57%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,488.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6466 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
42
44.680851063829785%
Value, $/FPS
$20.45/FPS
77.45721271393643%
Price, $
$859
100%
Buy for $859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Core i5-10300H
null-core
Single-Core
1369
48.85795860099928%
Multi-Core
4008
24.267377088883507%
acer Predator Helios Neo 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i5-10300H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
