Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 outperforms the cheaper MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing MSI Katana GF76 17 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 Laptop
- Performs up to 95% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 86 vs 44 FPS
Advantages of MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 49% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 - $999.00 vs $1959.00
- Up to 0% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 - $22.70 vs $22.78 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$22.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1959
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Buy for $999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
68%
Multi-Core
7887
48%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 2024 Laptop | vs | MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 17.3" |