Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Nitro V 16 outperforms the more expensive ASUS TUF A16 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF A16 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than ASUS TUF A16 - $1329.99 vs $1399.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing No Man's Sky than ASUS TUF A16 - $10.47 vs $11.1 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1329.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,329.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32750 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
126
99.21259842519686%
Value, $/FPS
$11.1/FPS
94.32432432432434%
Price, $
$1399
95%
Buy for $1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32752 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 8845HS
null-core
Single-Core
2486
100%
Multi-Core
11671
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
null-core
Single-Core
2470
99.35639581657281%
Multi-Core
11626
99.61442892639877%
acer Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 8845HS | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 16" |