Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — acer Nitro V 16 outperforms the more expensive MALLRACE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of acer Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 820% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than MALLRACE - 92 vs 10 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than MALLRACE - $1499.0 vs $1699.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than MALLRACE - $16.29 vs $170.0 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
2nd Variation
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32508 minutes ago
FPS
10
10.869565217391305%
Value, $/FPS
$170/FPS
9.58235294117647%
Price, $
$1699.99
88%
Buy for $1,699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32507 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Radeon Vega 8
System-Shared | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
16 GPixel/s
17.636684303350968%
Texel Fillrate
64 GTexel/s
35.28114663726571%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 7 8845HS
null-core
Single-Core
2486
100%
Multi-Core
11671
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro V 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | MALLRACE Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 8845HS | CPU | Ryzen 7 5825U |
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | Radeon Vega 8 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |