Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive acer Nitro 5 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 76% better in Control than acer Nitro 5 - 86 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than acer Nitro 5 - $989.0 vs $1089.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Control than acer Nitro 5 - $11.5 vs $22.22 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
13th Variation
FPS
49
56.97674418604651%
Value, $/FPS
$22.22/FPS
51.755175517551756%
Price, $
$1089
90%
Buy for $1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74676 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$989
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $989 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
13th Variation
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
46.60493827160494%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37.29327453142227%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
96.74134419551935%
Multi-Core
7887
84.98006680314622%
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
acer Nitro 5 Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
