Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive acer Nitro 5 15.6 FHD(1920x1080) IPS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 1017% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than acer Nitro 5 15.6 FHD(1920x1080) IPS - 67 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than acer Nitro 5 15.6 FHD(1920x1080) IPS - $809.0 vs $859.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than acer Nitro 5 15.6 FHD(1920x1080) IPS - $12.07 vs $143.17 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
6
8.955223880597014%
Value, $/FPS
$143.17/FPS
8.4305371236991%
Price, $
$859
94%
Buy for $859 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31309 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
67
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro 5 15.6 FHD(1920x1080) IPS Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-10300H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
