Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive acer Nitro 5 15.6“ FHD IPS on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 2000% better in Starfield than acer Nitro 5 15.6“ FHD IPS - 21 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than acer Nitro 5 15.6“ FHD IPS - $809.0 vs $827.84
- Up to 95% better value when playing Starfield than acer Nitro 5 15.6“ FHD IPS - $38.52 vs $827.84 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
1
4.761904761904762%
Value, $/FPS
$827.84/FPS
4.6530730575956705%
Price, $
$827.84
97%
Buy for $827.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37215 minutes ago
13th Variation
FPS
21
100%
Value, $/FPS
$38.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37462 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
53.43915343915344%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
53.450937155457545%
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
acer Nitro 5 15.6“ FHD IPS Gaming Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11400H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
