Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer Nitro 17 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Acer Nitro 17 - 34 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Acer Nitro 17 - $1549.0 vs $1769.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Acer Nitro 17 - $45.56 vs $55.28 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
11th Variation
FPS
32
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$55.28/FPS
82.41678726483357%
Price, $
$1769
87%
Buy for $1,769 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51399 minutes ago
16th Variation
FPS
34
100%
Value, $/FPS
$45.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1549
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,549 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
11th Variation
16th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
16th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
96.68016194331985%
Multi-Core
11190
96.24978496473422%
16th Variation
Ryzen 9 7940HS
4.0 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2470
100%
Multi-Core
11626
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Nitro 17 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Ryzen 9 7940HS |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 2560x1440 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
