Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Asus TUF A16 outperforms the more expensive Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop
- Performs up to 143% better in F1 22 than Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator - 129 vs 53 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator - $949.0 vs $1598.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing F1 22 than Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator - $7.36 vs $30.15 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
FPS
53
41.08527131782946%
Value, $/FPS
$30.15/FPS
24.411276948590384%
Price, $
$1598
59%
Buy for $1,598 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2226 minutes ago
11th Variation
FPS
129
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$949
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $949 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
11th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
39.682539682539684%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
39.691289966923925%
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
null-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator Laptop | vs | Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-10750H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 14" | Screen Size | 16" |
