Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 outperforms the cheaper Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator Laptop
- Up to 22% cheaper than ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 - $1598.0 vs $2049.0
Advantages of ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 504% better in FIFA 23 than Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator - 163 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 79% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator - $12.57 vs $59.19 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
27
16.56441717791411%
Value, $/FPS
$59.19/FPS
21.236695387734418%
Price, $
$1598
100%
Buy for $1,598 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65437 minutes ago
15th Variation
FPS
163
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$2049
77%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $2,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65440 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
44.24778761061947%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
29.49610815239656%
15th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
Acer ConceptD 3 Ezel CC314-72G-72SX Convertible Creator Laptop | vs | ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 Gaming Laptop |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10750H | CPU | Core i9-13900 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
512 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
14" | Screen Size | 16" |