The UHD Graphics P630 Mobile is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the UHD Graphics P630 Mobile
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 15 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
UHD Graphics P630 Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
UHD Graphics P630 Mobile
May 24th, 2018
Average FPS
45
40%
Min 1% FPS
16
25%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Mar 21st, 2023
Average FPS
112
100%
Min 1% FPS
63
100%
Price, $
$1529
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.65/FPS
100%
UHD Graphics P630 Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The UHD Graphics P630 Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The UHD Graphics P630 Mobile vs RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
UHD Graphics P630 Mobile
May 24th, 2018
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
10%
FP32
460.8 GFLOPS
2%
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Mar 21st, 2023
Memory
20 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
99.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
299.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.17 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
UHD Graphics P630 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 24th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 21st, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
HD Graphics-WM (Coffee Lake) | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 20 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 160-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 280 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
3.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 99.84 GPixel/s |
28.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 299.5 GTexel/s |
460.8 GFLOPS | FP32 | 19.17 TFLOPS |