In Deathloop, the UHD Graphics 770 is quite a bit faster than the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
UHD Graphics 770
- Up to 28% faster in Deathloop – 60 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 15 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
UHD Graphics 770 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Average FPS
47 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
35 FPS
78%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
UHD Graphics 770 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
UHD Graphics 770 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile: Comparison of core performance specifications
UHD Graphics 770
Sep 27th, 2022
Memory
0 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
12.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
24.8 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
793.6 GFLOPS
100%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile
May 27th, 2013
Memory
0 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
39%
Texture Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
768 GFLOPS
97%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
UHD Graphics 770 Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Mobile May 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | May 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Raptor Lake) | Generation | HD Graphics-M (Haswell) |
Integrated | Segment | Integrated |
15 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
