In Atomfall, the UHD Graphics 770 is slower than the Arc A350M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
UHD Graphics 770
- Is 5 months and 28 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 30, 2022
- Is 5 months and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 15 vs 25 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
Arc A350M
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 34 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350M: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350M: Comparison of core performance specifications
UHD Graphics 770
Sep 27th, 2022
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
12.4 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
24.8 GTexel/s
23%
FP32
793.6 GFLOPS
23%
Arc A350M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
52.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
UHD Graphics 770 Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A350M Mar 30th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | Mar 30th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Raptor Lake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3 Mobile) |
Integrated | Segment | Laptop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
