In Rust, the UHD Graphics 770 is slower than the Arc A350. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
UHD Graphics 770
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 15 vs 25 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
Arc A350
- Up to 19% faster in Rust – 120 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 19% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
UHD Graphics 770 vs Arc A350: Comparison of core performance specifications
UHD Graphics 770
Sep 27th, 2022
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
12.4 GPixel/s
26%
Texture Fillrate
24.8 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
793.6 GFLOPS
26%
Arc A350
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
48 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
96 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.072 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
UHD Graphics 770 Sep 27th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 27th, 2022 | Released | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Raptor Lake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
