In Deathloop, the UHD Graphics 730 is quite a bit slower than the Arc A310. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
UHD Graphics 730
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 15 vs 30 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Arc A310
- Up to 43% faster in Deathloop – 80 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 43% faster in Deathloop
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Mar 30, 2021
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
UHD Graphics 730 vs Arc A310: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
80 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$118.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
UHD Graphics 730 vs Arc A310: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
UHD Graphics 730 vs Arc A310: Comparison of core performance specifications
UHD Graphics 730
Mar 30th, 2021
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
10.4 GPixel/s
37%
Texture Fillrate
15.6 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
499.2 GFLOPS
19%
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
UHD Graphics 730 Mar 30th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A310 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 30th, 2021 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | – |
| HD Graphics (Rocket Lake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 3) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 30 W |
