In Atomfall, the UHD Graphics 610 is much slower than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
UHD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 93% less energy – 15 vs 225 Watts
- Consumes up to 93% less energy
Arc A750
- Up to 181% faster in Atomfall – 76 vs 27 FPS
- Up to 181% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Oct 12, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
UHD Graphics 610 vs Arc A750: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
76 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
100%
Price, $
$264.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
UHD Graphics 610 vs Arc A750: Comparison of synthetic benchmarks
Performance Specifications
UHD Graphics 610 vs Arc A750: Comparison of core performance specifications
UHD Graphics 610
Apr 30th, 2020
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
2.1 GPixel/s
1%
Texture Fillrate
12.6 GTexel/s
2%
FP32
201.6 GFLOPS
1%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
UHD Graphics 610 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Arc A750 Oct 12th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $289.00 |
| HD Graphics (Comet Lake) | Generation | Alchemist (Arc 7) |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
