The Tesla C2050 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX 4500 Ada Generation. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Tesla C2050
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is better in every way
Advantages of the RTX 4500 Ada Generation
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 12% less energy – 210 vs 238 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 3 GB
Tesla C2050 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Tesla C2050
Jul 25th, 2011
Average FPS
46
28%
Min 1% FPS
16
16%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Aug 9th, 2023
Average FPS
164
100%
Min 1% FPS
100
100%
Price, $
$2329.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.2/FPS
100%
Tesla C2050 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Tesla C2050 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Tesla C2050 vs RTX 4500 Ada Generation in core GPU performance specifications
Tesla C2050
Jul 25th, 2011
Memory
3 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
16.07 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
32.14 GTexel/s
5%
FP32
1.0277 TFLOPS
3%
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Aug 9th, 2023
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
206.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
619.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
39.63 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Tesla C2050 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jul 25th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 9th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Tesla Fermi (x20xx) | Generation | Workstation Ada (x000A) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 238 W | Power Consumption | 210 W |
| Memory | ||
| 3 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 16.07 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 206.4 GPixel/s |
| 32.14 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 619.2 GTexel/s |
| 1.0277 TFLOPS | FP32 | 39.63 TFLOPS |
