The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $123.73 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 64
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- Up to 26% cheaper – $349.22 vs $472.95
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 120 vs 295 Watts
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Average FPS
90
100%
Min 1% FPS
49
100%
Price, $
$472.95
73%
Value, $/FPS
$5.25/FPS
80%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
92%
Min 1% FPS
44
90%
Price, $
$349.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$349.22
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.99
In Stock
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX Vega 64
Aug 7th, 2017
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
483.8 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
12.66 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
60%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
43%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
43%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX Vega 64 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 7th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 22nd, 2019 |
| $499.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Vega | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 295 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 6 GB |
| HBM2 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 2048-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
483.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
98.94 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 84.96 GPixel/s |
395.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 169.9 GTexel/s |
12.66 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.437 TFLOPS |
