The Radeon RX Vega 11 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX Vega 11
- Consumes up to 80% less energy – 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX Vega 11
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
47
73%
Min 1% FPS
20
65%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$343.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.37/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$221.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$319.05
In Stock
Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX Vega 11 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX Vega 11
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
11.2 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
66%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
66%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX Vega 11 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
Picasso | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
15 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
11.2 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
61.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
1.971 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |