The Radeon RX 6650M is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 115 vs 120 Watts
Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
96
79%
Min 1% FPS
53
75%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
55%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
90%
FP32
15.62 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 81.36 GPixel/s |
270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 244.1 GTexel/s |
| 8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 15.62 TFLOPS |
