The Radeon RX 6650 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R5 240 OEM and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $395.47 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 88% cheaper – $54.99 vs $450.46
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 50 vs 176 Watts
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$450.46
12%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
33%
Buy on Amazon
$450.46
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,819.67
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
37%
Min 1% FPS
15
25%
Price, $
$54.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
5%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
4%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
6%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
6%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R5 240 OEM |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
$399.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
176 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.24 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 18.72 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 599 GFLOPS |