The Radeon RX 6650 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 960 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $196.16 more expensive!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Up to 43% cheaper – $255.00 vs $451.16
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 120 vs 176 Watts
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce GTX 960 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, $
$451.16
56%
Value, $/FPS
$4.21/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$451.16
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$1,819.67
In Stock
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
51%
Min 1% FPS
25
42%
Price, $
$255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
91%
Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce GTX 960 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce GTX 960 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce GTX 960 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
280.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
168.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
337.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
10.79 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
40%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
22%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
22%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
22%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 960 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 176 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
280.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
168.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 37.7 GPixel/s |
337.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 75.39 GTexel/s |
10.79 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.413 TFLOPS |
