The Radeon RX 6600M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600M
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 100 vs 110 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
95
61%
Min 1% FPS
52
54%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
157
100%
Min 1% FPS
96
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
52%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
35%
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
133.2 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
386.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
24.72 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6600M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 110 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 432 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| 270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 386.3 GTexel/s |
| 8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 24.72 TFLOPS |
