The Radeon RX 6600M is a slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 100 vs 215 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
95
88%
Min 1% FPS
52
85%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Average FPS
108
100%
Min 1% FPS
61
100%
Price, $
$749
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.93/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$749.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$788.88
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$399.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$768.88
In Stock
Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6600M vs GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6600M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
96%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
96%
GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
Jul 9th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
113.3 GPixel/s
73%
Texture Fillrate
283.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.062 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6600M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 9th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499.00 |
Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 20 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
100 W | Power Consumption | 215 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 113.3 GPixel/s |
270.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 283.2 GTexel/s |
8.659 TFLOPS | FP32 | 9.062 TFLOPS |