The Radeon RX 6600 LE is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6950 XT. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600 LE
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 132 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6950 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs Radeon RX 6950 XT for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Dec 8th, 2023
Average FPS
93
55%
Min 1% FPS
51
49%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, $
$894.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.26/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6600 LE vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6600 LE vs Radeon RX 6950 XT in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Dec 8th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
159.7 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
279.4 GTexel/s
38%
FP32
8.942 TFLOPS
38%
Radeon RX 6950 XT
May 10th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
23.65 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6600 LE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 8th, 2023 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,099.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Navi II |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
132 W | Power Consumption | 335 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 159.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 295.7 GPixel/s |
| 279.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 739.2 GTexel/s |
| 8.942 TFLOPS | FP32 | 23.65 TFLOPS |
