The Radeon RX 6600 LE is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6600 LE
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 132 vs 285 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 12 vs 8 GB
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Dec 8th, 2023
Average FPS
93
53%
Min 1% FPS
51
47%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
109
100%
Price, $
$1040.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.94/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6600 LE
Dec 8th, 2023
Memory
8 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
159.7 GPixel/s
76%
Texture Fillrate
279.4 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
8.942 TFLOPS
22%
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6600 LE | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Dec 8th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $799.00 |
Navi II | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
132 W | Power Consumption | 285 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
128-bit | Memory Bus | 192-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
159.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 208.8 GPixel/s |
279.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 626.4 GTexel/s |
8.942 TFLOPS | FP32 | 40.09 TFLOPS |