The Radeon RX 6550M is a faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- A faster GPU for gaming
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 53 vs 80 Watts
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
36
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
91%
Min 1% FPS
31
86%
Price, $
$212.47
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$212.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$179.47
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$174.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$362.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Buy on Amazon
N/A
Out of Stock
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
82%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
61%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.27 GPixel/s |
181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.4 GTexel/s |
5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.565 TFLOPS |
