The Radeon RX 6500 XT is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $110.00 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6500 XT
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 37% cheaper – $189.00 vs $299.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 107 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
The Radeon RX 6500 XT is better in every way
Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
74
100%
Min 1% FPS
38
100%
Price, $
$189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$189.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$169.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$224.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$159.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$234.82
In Stock
Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6500 XT vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
143.9 GB/s
45%
Pixel Fillrate
90.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
180.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.765 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
67%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
84%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
84%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6500 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $399.00 |
Navi II | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
107 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
143.9 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
90.08 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
180.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
5.765 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |