The Radeon RX 590 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1650 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $104.91 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 47% cheaper – $119.99 vs $224.90
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
88%
Min 1% FPS
31
84%
Price, $
$224.9
53%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
47%
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 590 vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
42%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 590 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 15th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| $279.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 175 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.44 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
222.5 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
7.119 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
