The Radeon RX 5700 XT is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $59.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 20% cheaper – $239.99 vs $299.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 225 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is better in every way
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, $
$239.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$239.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$539.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$529.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
53%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
52%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
225 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
