The Radeon RX 560 XT is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- Consumes up to 14% less energy – 150 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
88%
Min 1% FPS
31
84%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
88%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
79%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
62%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
62%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
