The Radeon RX 560 XT is the same performance gaming GPU as the GeForce GTX 1650. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
The GeForce GTX 1650 is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 75 vs 150 Watts
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, $
$224.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.51/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$224.90
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$343.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$273.45
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$349.12
In Stock
Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
74%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
57%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
68%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
68%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 53.28 GPixel/s |
137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 93.24 GTexel/s |
4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.984 TFLOPS |
