The Radeon RX 5500M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 5090. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5500M
- Consumes up to 85% less energy – 85 vs 575 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 5090
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory – 32 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce RTX 5090 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Average FPS
69
29%
Min 1% FPS
35
21%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
242
100%
Min 1% FPS
166
100%
Price, $
$4058.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$16.77/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
$4,058.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,499.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
$4,860.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5500M vs GeForce RTX 5090 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5500M
Oct 7th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
12%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
13%
Pixel Fillrate
52.64 GPixel/s
12%
Texture Fillrate
144.8 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
4.632 TFLOPS
4%
GeForce RTX 5090
Jan 30th, 2025
Memory
32 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1790 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
423.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1637 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
104.8 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5500M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 50 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
85 W | Power Consumption | 575 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 32 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR7 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1790 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 52.64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 423.6 GPixel/s |
| 144.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1637 GTexel/s |
| 4.632 TFLOPS | FP32 | 104.8 TFLOPS |
